《狂飙》带火山东强盛，老板孙红雷以前也卖鱼，啥来头？******
中新网2月1日电(中新财经记者 吴涛)随着《狂飙》的热映，近日，一家名为山东强盛集团有限公司的企业因和《狂飙》中强盛集团“撞名”引发热议。
随着企业信息被深扒，人们发现，这家企业法人代表孙红雷也卖过鱼，干过房地产，这更引发网友们的兴趣，这家企业究竟是什么来头？
山东强盛集团意外走红，企业法人有多家公司
天眼查显示，山东强盛集团有限公司，成立于2020年，注册资本1亿元，法人代表、最终受益人和实际控制人为孙红雷。
孙红雷投资公司一览。天眼查截图孙红雷对山东强盛集团有限公司持股99%，山东强盛集团有限公司旗下拥有山东免检体育科技有限公司，持股90%，属于绝对控股。
除了山东强盛集团有限公司，孙红雷还100%持有临沂商城吉泰冷冻产品销售部。另外，孙红雷还投资了山东临沂河东农村商业银行股份有限公司、玫瑰传说(上海)酒店管理有限公司(吊销未注销)、山东宇帆体育场馆管理有限公司。
山东宇帆体育场馆管理有限公司旗下还有一家公司，名为临沂宇帆滨河高尔夫俱乐部有限公司，不过孙红雷对山东宇帆体育场馆管理有限公司持股比例并不高，仅为4.28%。
借势营销，山东强盛开卖《孙子兵法》、电视机等
有意思的是，山东强盛集团和《狂飙》中的强盛集团有诸多相似之处：卖过鱼、干过房地产。
山东强盛集团开始售卖《孙子兵法》、电视机等。抖音截图山东强盛集团有限公司曾用名为山东强盛房地产开发有限公司。在《狂飙》中，强盛集团一项很重要的业务就是房地产业务。
在山东强盛集团走红后，其抖音橱窗的商品也丰富了起来，上线了《孙子兵法》书籍、《狂飙》原著书籍、液晶电视机、三文鱼、带鱼段、咖啡粉、可安装在手机上的小灵通翻盖镜子等。
在《狂飙》中，这些可都是“网红物件”。因为主人公高启强最早就是卖鱼的，给人送礼等离子电视，喜欢干嚼咖啡粉，读《孙子兵法》，其弟弟高启胜卖小灵通。
网友纷纷表示，强盛集团是懂营销的。还有网友调侃：“什么时候开个白金瀚。”“还别说，山东临沂市当地有个非常有名的酒店：金佰翰。”
孙红雷回应：我们是遵纪守法的公司
在山东强盛集团走红网络后，网友纷纷调侃：我建议你自首；建议有关部门查查；《狂飙》编剧是不是住你家附近？
孙红雷回应。截图山东强盛集团在社交平台晒出“一屋子”荣誉证书自证“清白”。不过这马上招来网友调侃：《狂飙》强盛集团也有大量荣誉证书，高启强故居甚至还挂满奖状。
1月30日，孙红雷亲自回应：“我们强盛集团和电视剧中的没有任何的关联，更不是电视剧里的原型。我本人确实叫孙红雷，并不是演员。”
在直播中，孙红雷还表示，“我从初中毕业就开始卖鱼，我们是遵纪守法的公司。”(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
